miércoles, 16 de octubre de 2019

SENDING EMAILS

TWENTY QUESTIONS TO ASK OF YOUR PARTNER TO KNOW HOW ADDICTED THEY ARE TO THEIR SOCIAL MEDIA


  1. How do you usually communicate ? Do you write emails ? To whom and why ? 
  2. How many emails do you send a day ? a week ? 
  3. Do you use emails in your job ? 
  4. Would you end a relationship by mail ? Why why not ¡ 
  5. Do you use text messages ? 
  6. Do you think they show how poor people s writing skills are ? 
  7. Did you join a group recently ? 
  8. Why do people join a group ? 
  9. How important is FACEBOOK to you ? Instagram ? 
  10. Would you publish a photo of you going on holidays on facebook Why / why not ?
  11. What might happen ? 
  12. How safe or dangerous is facebook ?
  13. Does it attack your privacy ? 
  14. Have many crimes been discovered because of facebook ? How ? 
  15. How often do you share important news on facebook ? 
  16. What do you use your mobile  for ?  
  17. Would you start a date with someone you have met on facebook ? why / why not ? 
  18. How useful is SKYPE ? 
  19. How often do you use YOU TUBE ?   
  20. Do you send ecards ? 
Use these questions to conduct a survey in your class Write the answers   and comment on your conclusions 

how fickle is fashion ?

Do you think fashion is important in society?

 0
YES i definitely agree / NO I should say I disagree on this point 
By Katherine Barnes
Yes, I do think fashion is important in society because it allows people to express their personality. Throughout the ages fashion has been an important part of society and culture. As the human world developed so did the practice of clothing and what people developed out of different materials to wear. From the beautiful arcs of printed silk dresses made in dynastic China, to the elaborate corseted ball gowns of eighteenth century England, what a colourful and imaginative array of designs that mankind has developed over the years!
It is true that there are some stigmas with the fashion world which are understandable. Some people believe that the modern world of fashion can be restrictive, harsh and projects an unrealistic expectation of models and a price tag. However, I think that fashion doesn’t need to be expensive, or a small size to be enjoyed. Fashion is about uniqueness and not adhering to what is considering the ‘latest’ or ‘trendy’. Fashion is important in society because it has the potential to bring different people together to celebrate their own individuality. The best way to enjoy fashion is to wear what you love and be yourself!

NO
By Annie Patel
Why does one’s appearance hold such importance these days? I can’t leave the house without making sure that I look acceptable for others, never mind myself, and it’s infuriating. In countries like South Korea, keeping up with the latest fashion and appearance is so important, it can affect your ability of gaining employment. That is taking fashion too far don’t you think?
In modern society, we place fashion too high on the scale. The fact that wearing a tracksuit or a suit changes people’s perceptions of someone’s personality is so ridiculous. And don’t get me started on brands. It doesn’t make you a better person if you wear a designer brand than a cheaper brand, it makes you a worse person if you think it does.
Dress codes in a work environment are something that doesn’t need to exist. I just don’t understand how wearing a tight pencil skirt is acceptable office wear for sitting down in an uncomfortable chair from 9 to 5. On the opposite end of the spectrum, those women that risk their health for wearing 4 inch stilettos to work every day are plain crazy, brave but crazy.
Fashion is so fickle and it’s exhausting having to keep up with trends. I don’t know how Anna Wintour does it.

miércoles, 9 de octubre de 2019

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NOT A LOVE STORY

Many women die  in the hands of their intimate partners

THIS IS NOT A LOVE STORY
BY THE HUFFINTON POST

Read and discuss : 



https://testkitchen.huffingtonpost.com/this-is-not-a-love-story/

LIGHT POLLUTION

The Problems of Light Pollution -- Overview

Light pollution: Any adverse effect of artificial light including sky glow, glare, light trespass, light clutter, decreased visibility at night, and energy waste. Light pollution is not only a hinderance to astronomy, but it also impacts us directly.
Light pollution:
City lights creates a perversely unnatural orange night sky.Use the links above to learn more information about the different effects that light pollution causes. Light pollution is similar to the widespread long term damage a toxic chemical spill creates across the land. We ignore this at our own peril and we need to think about what this means for us.
Look at the picture at the right. Do you find yourself asking:
What planet is that city from?
Could you tell by the sky color? Is it night or day there? Would kindergardeners there use a lot of orange for their drawings of the night? While it does look more like a futuristic city on Saturn's moon Titan, excessive and poorly pointed city lights creates a perversely unnatural orange night sky, such as in London, England seen here.
So, with my apologies to Dylan Thomas:
Do not go gentle into that bland copper light.
Rage, rage for the majestic wonder of the night.



Identifying Good Light Sources

Before we go into what light pollution is, let us first consider and define why we even use lighting, what good lighting is and what it should do. I know that this may seem terribly basic, but unless we take a small moment to consider these concepts, then we may disagree or misunderstand what is needed to be done.
Why do we even use lighting? - We are a diurnal species. This means that our eyes evolved to function best in the daytime lighting conditions. While we can function at night with a little bit of light with the rod cells in our eyes, say from the moon, we do not function as well as other species that are truly nocturnal. So, outdoor lighting provides visibility for us to conduct day-like activities at nighttime. Correctly done, we then see good outdoor lighting as an attractive benefit for our communities. Because of our preferences for daytime light levels, and the very basic, primitive fear we feel for darkened places that could hide a predator (those that did not heed such feelings so long ago were, over time, eliminated from passing on offspring!), we very much like light. It gives us a feeling of safety and security, even if the feeling is sometimes inappropriate for a particular situation.
Light can be used to enhance a theme or goals of the community when highlighting somoething it is proud to display. But that one aspect is so increasingly abused by so many that the displayed item just becomes hidden in the ever greater visual noise and clutter. As such, bad lighting is so pervasive and common now, that it is hard for people to recognize that it is so. Yet, there still should be some basic ideas or concepts that everyone would probably agree on that we should expect about what good outdoor lighting to provide.
Good Outdoor Lighting Should:
  • Optimize visibility at night for what we want lit
  • Minimize energy consumption
  • Minimize impact on the environment and ourselves
  • Minimize glare
  • Minimize light trespass
The second and the third concepts everyone would naturally agree upon, no one wants our resources or money to be intentionally wasted, nor does anyone want our lights to directly cause harm to the environment that we all depend on or to ourselves. The last two concepts are covered down below.
See what's lit, not the light - Believe it or not, it is that first concept, to Optimize visibility at night for what we want lit that is often one of the hardest for people to realize, recognize or understand. And yet it sounds so simple. It simply means this, we want to be able to see those things that are needed to be seen. Being blinded by the source of the light that provides the illumination is counterproductive to this end. Because the contrasting intensity of a light's source is often so extreme compared to anything else that is to be lit up by that light, having to see the light's source can actually impede our ability to see those things that we want or need to see. The Light pollution vs. Economics page shows an example on this concept.
It is an incredibly simple concept. However, more often than not, what can only be seen is the lights' source and not the area around it that needs to be illuminated. Sunspots on the Sun have a similar problem. While they look dark to us, sunspots themselves DO shine out light. However, they are so overpowered by their surrounding, brighter photosphere surface regions that they look dark. Likewise, decorative lighting in some kind of glassy-brassy housing fixture (or luminaire) often makes no effort at all at hiding the source of the light and, as such, it fails in all of the above concepts. Yet how often does one see decorative lighting used in the front of homes or businesses? It is as if the sole point of the light is to just see the light itself and not particularly care that anything around it is properly illuminated.
In general, the guiding principle to good lighting can be summed up in this concept:

no light should ever be emitted above
the light source's horizontal plane.

Once this simple guideline is followed, a great deal of the problems regarding light pollution are immediately dealt with and solved.
However, if that principle is not followed, then we encounter a variety of problems from light pollution. The immediate problems that poor lighting can cause are shown below. Other more long term and damaging problems are listed on the other pages linked in the menu above.

Identifying Light Pollution

Light pollution is light that is not being efficently or completely utilized and is often pointed outwards or upwards and not downwards. Hence it is light that is often found to be rude or oppressive to the non-owners of the light. How so? Well imagine spending an hour outside at night to enjoy the stars, when someone walks up to you and shines a flashlight in your face. The light hurts your eyes and temporarily blinds you. Such an action is clearly rude. Yet no one thinks that it is equally and permanently rude that a person installs an outward pointing light on the side of a building to illuminate their grounds or parking lot or area around the building. Such people fail to consider just how far their security lights extend and bother other people. Such owners seem to think that if you wanted it to be dark, then you should go somewhere else. Yet the problem is that in today's society there is no where else to go to avoid lights at night. The darkest region in America, the American desert, can still see the lights of Las Vegas from 250 miles away. Such owners have, in all probability, chosen to locate themself to be close to where people live and work. I can guarantee that the other people, downlight from them, did not move to be near that offender's light.
So let us cover some basic definitions about light pollution:
Urban sky glow - the brightening of the night sky over inhabited areas. It is the "glow" effect that can be seen over distant populated areas. This light that escapes up into the sky is created by the combination of all light reflected off of what is being illuminated, from all of the badly directed light in that area, and from that light that is scattered (redirected) by the atmosphere itself from reaching the ground. This scattering is very strongly related to the wavelength of the light when the air is very clear (with very little aerosols). Rayleigh scattering dominates in such clear air, making the sky appear blue in the daytime.
Putrid bland copper colored
          night sky.
More bland copper-colored night sky.
Image Credit: Chuck Bueter www.nightwise.org
Newly installed lights blasts neighboring houses.
Image Credit: Chuck Bueter www.nightwise.org


Light trespass
 - light falling where it is not intended, wanted, or needed. Street lighting, for example, should light streets and sidewalks, not shine into peoples' bedroom windows or illuminate rooftops or tree branches. Also known as spill light, light trespass occurs whenever light shines beyond the intended target and onto adjacent properties.

To the left is an image of houses in Grainger Indiana that are irradiated by the newly installed lights of the nearby baseball fields of the Harris Township Junior Baseball and Softball Association. Officials had said that the new configuration would spill light that is equivalent to a full moon, yet it is many times stronger. Does anyone really believe that the owners of the houses shown are happy with the new lights and the interruptions of their sleep?
Glare - the sensation produced by luminance within the visual field that is sufficiently greater than the luminance to which the eyes are adapted to. It creates an unnerving, oppressive, annoying, discomforting feeling that can cause a loss in our visual performance, visibility and can be dangerous. High levels of glare can decrease visibility for the elderly, drivers of motor vehicles and astronomers. It is easily recognized by when a viewer's pupils will close down in its presence. This makes dimmer objects harder to see, and that increases the danger.

Here a student crosses a crowded parking lot while the driver has to contend with the light at the end of the parking lot. Add a drizzle of rain, and someone's need to hurry and we have the makings of a tragic accident.
Glare lights can endanger pedestrians and drivers.
Billboards are now a common source of prodigous uplight.








Uplight
 - wasted light, pure and simple. Light that goes directly up into the night sky is "lost in space" and serves no useful purpose (though the most often used for self centered vain purposes). Uplight is the bane of astronomers and the occasional stargazer because atmospheric scattering artificially brightens the night sky, making distant celestial light sources difficult or impossible to see. Uplight often results from light fixtures which also produce glare and light trespass.

See also Adam Kuban's example on the Economics page of wasted uplight.
Clutter - bright, confusing, ugly and excessive groupings of light sources, commonly found in over-lit urban areas. The proliferation of clutter contributes to urban sky glow, trespass, and glare.

Businesses that compete against one another often try to outshine each other. This leads to a one-up-man-ship war that simply hurts all. Note how the clutter basically de-emphansizes each store and turns the view into an offensive, ugly, and blinding mess.
Businesses competing for attention only make the view look cluttered and messy.
Image Credit: Chuck Bueter www.nightwise.org
The following pages will present some arguments against light pollution. Please spend a moment going through them and learn how light pollution negatively affects you, in so many ways. As there is no staff, except for myself, these pages are being filled in slowly. I'll update the pages over time when I get new information, read more papers, or take more pictures. Please be patient with me and please be pro-active yourself.

If future generations are to remember us with gratitude rather than comtempt, we must leave them more than the miracles of technology.

We must leave them a glimpse of the world as it was in the beginning, not just after we got through with it.

-- Lyndon B. Johnson


Department of Physics
Florida Atlantic University
Boca Raton, Florida

lunes, 7 de octubre de 2019

WHAT IS BUILT IN OBSOLESCENCE ?

Planned Obsolescence Advantages & Disadvantages

by Patrick Gleeson, Ph. D.,
Contemporary marketing promotes aesthetic obscolescence.
Planned obsolescence is the practice of producing consumer goods requiring frequent replacement. A manufacturer may use materials that won't last, or may discontinue supplying spare parts needed for product repairs. But there may be no physical reason at all. The manufacturer simply may present a consumer product that is superceded by a newer object, prompting consumers to find the older object displeasing. In this sense, obsolescence may reside not only in the manufacturer's choices, but also in the consumer's state of mind.

jueves, 8 de agosto de 2019

climate change and food

Changing climate imperils global food and water supplies, new U.N. study finds
Emissions from agriculture and other land use account for 23 percent of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.
 
Rainforest being removed to make way for palm oil and rubber plantations.
Rainforest being removed to make way for palm oil and rubber plantations.Shutterstock
The world cannot avoid the worst impacts of climate change without making serious changes to the ways humans grow food, raise livestock and manage forests, according to a landmark study Thursday from an international group of scientists.
The sprawling report from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) examines how land use around the world contributes to the warming of Earth’s atmosphere. But it also details how climate change is already threatening food and water supplies for humans: turning arable land to desert, degrading soil and increasing the threat of droughts, floods and other extreme weather that can wreak havoc on crops.
It makes clear that while fossil fuel-burning power plants and automobile tailpipes are the largest drivers of climate change, activities such as agriculture and forestry account for an estimated 23 percent of total human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.
“We already knew that humanity’s over-exploitation of the Earth’s lands is a key driver of climate change, and that we need to take urgent, ambitious action to address these issues,” Jennifer Tabola, director for global climate strategy at the Nature Conservancy, said in a statement. “We have a choice: do we balance the needs of human development and nature, or do we sleepwalk into a future of failing farmlands, eroding soil, collapsing ecosystems and dwindling food resources?”
Four years ago in Paris, world leaders agreed to take aggressive action to keep global warming to “well below” 2 degree Celsius, compared with preindustrial levels. Their aspiration was to limit warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius (the world has already warmed 1 degree).
But Thursday’s report, which includes the work of 107 experts from 52 countries, underscores that meeting those goals will require fundamental changes not only to the transportation and energy sectors, but also by cutting emissions from agriculture and deforestation — all while feeding growing populations.
Last fall, IPCC scientists found that nations will need to take “unprecedented” actions to cut their carbon emissions over the next decade to avoid devastating effects from rising seas, more intense storms and other impacts of climate change.
They also detailed how such a radical transformation would require large swaths of land currently used to produce food to instead be converted to growing trees that store carbon and crops designated for energy use.
“Such large transitions pose profound challenges for sustainable management of the various demands on land for human settlements, food, livestock feed, fibre, bioenergy, carbon storage, biodiversity and other ecosystem services,” the authors wrote at the time.
A significant amount of agricultural emissions comes from livestock — primarily from the belches of cattle. Additionally, while all soils emit some nitrous oxide, soil on farms often emits higher levels due to nitrogen that is added in the form of manure, fertilizers or other material. Meanwhile, deforestation in places such as the Amazon and Indonesia has harmed the ability of forests to retain carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
But solving those problems is complicated.
While sharply reducing the number of livestock could have significant impacts by cutting emissions by billions of tons, that would require large-scale changes to what people eat.
“After decades of overconsumption, our society needs to shift toward healthy, ecological, plant-based farming,” Reyes Tirado, a senior research scientist at Greenpeace Research Laboratory, based at the University of Exeter, said in a statement about the report. “This won’t be easy, but it is critical if we’re to reverse the devastation our current food system is having on ecosystems and communities around the world.”
Meanwhile, planting massive new forests, an approach known as afforestation, could help remove meaningful amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere each year. But doing that on a massive scale could sharply increase food prices and put millions of people at risk of undernourishment, said Pamela McElwee, a human ecology professor and a lead author of the report.
“So that’s a very serious trade-off,” McElwee told reporters Wednesday. “One of our arguments is, let’s understand those trade-offs now and think about them, but also think about things that maybe would help us avoid those trade offs.”
If there is a silver lining in such a daunting challenge, it is the fact that forests and farms play a key role as “carbon sinks” that remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but that benefit will continue only if humans use land in sustainable ways.
“As we’ve continued to pour more and more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the earth’s system has responded, and it’s continued to absorb more and more,” Louis Verchot, of the International Center for Tropical Agriculture and a lead author on the report, told reporters in a call Wednesday. “But the important finding of this report, I think, is that this additional gift from nature is limited. It’s not going to continue forever.”
Left unchecked, climate change could imperil food security in parts of the world, putting further strain on a food system that’s already stressed, Thursday’s report found. Crop yields could shrink. Foods such as wheat could become less nutritious. Damage from thawing permafrost could endanger infrastructure. Water scarcity could become an urgent problem in dry areas.
“Today’s report is a clarion call for the need for us to manage land better for people, nature and the climate,” Katherine Kramer, global climate lead for the London-based charity Christian Aid, said in a statement.
“There are many opportunities to create win-wins in the ways we use the land, but it’s vital we implement these quickly to avoid having to make bleak choices between feeding people and reducing emissions.”
Chris Mooney contributed to this report.

jueves, 1 de agosto de 2019

TOPIC EDUCATION

EDUCATIONAL ISSUES

Are you for or against HOMESCHOOLING ?  Is this a good option ?

Would you consider it for your children?

Read and discuss

 https://blog.connectionsacademy.com/5-reasons-to-homeschool-children/

lunes, 8 de julio de 2019

WHY DO STS LEARN ?

Why do students learn?

April 18, 2013, 11:49 PM IST  in EduCable | Lifestyle | TOI
 “If you don’t practice, how will you learn”, said the mother persuasively to the child.  
The child was tired. He had spent eight hours at school being alert for bullies, being callously careful about his books, tiffin and water bottle. And then, there was the classroom with the teacher who was so sure of everything that he was unsure of, writing so fast on the board. The Teacher wanted them to copy down everything and then go home and memorise it for the exams. What a terrible thing to happen to little children, the boy thought. A monster called examinations. His best friend was strange, she liked exams. She always said- “what is so special about exams? They ask questions, I answer them just like I answer them in class. If I don’t know the answers, I go home and find out more about it. Exams tell me what I need to figure out”. She was different, he know. The strange thing is that she always did quite well, just like he did. 
He hated the stress of learning. Ma would say, “You are a child, how can you have stress?” But it was difficult. He was a good boy and always tried his best. Dad would say, “you have to try better than your best. Then you know you are learning.” Of course dad must be right, so he tried even harder. How could he not? What if he did not get perfect marks? What if he did not come first? He had to come first, and get better marks than last time.  
He could not imagine being like the naughty children in class who seemed to have fun all the time. They never seemed to care much. But he did. One thing he could not bear was when marks were cut.. it was like someone had chopped off what belonged to him. “What happened? Where did two marks go?”, his aunt had asked him the last time he got 98 marks in Maths. He did not know, but it was horrible. Such a silly mistake and so much shame to bear for it. Never, never would he let the marks slip away – it was the worst punishment ever, felt even worse than being beaten (not that he was ever beaten). But he would do everything he could to stay away from bad performance. It wasn’t just marks, it was other things too. He worried about school assembly too – what if if went wrong? And worked harder. 
He was a hard worker and really organised. Nothing would stop him from winning. And nothing conquered his fear of losing more than organising his time table and revising his answers. 
************** 
Not all children are like the boy described above, but there is  little doubt that he would be known as a ‘good’ boy. Diligent, attentive in class, focused on ‘learning’ his material and achieving good grades. The perfect student one would think. Working hard to ensure that he never faces failure.  
What if we took away his fear of failure? 
Would he still know what to do? Would he still learn the same way?  
Did his best friend learn the same way, for the same reasons? She was not so afraid of failure, taking it in her stride. Any gaps were hers to fill. Her stakes were not so high, it seemed. And she seemed to do just as well as he did. 
********* 
All children learn differently. For many decades people have tried to create a taxonomy of learning styles, only to be discredited in recent times. From visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles to exhortations such as ““I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.” Teachers have been told to design their lessons to ensure that all learning styles get an opportunity to learn in their own way. Yet, as teachers juggle with range management in the classroom, learners of today are evolving in new ways. Given that the children (and youth) of today are more used to multiple stimuli, some of them learn quite well even in the middle of distraction. This is not just learning one’s ‘portions’ with the music on, it is more discordant than that. Children seem to learn, now, in the midst of chaos, of playing games, juggling toys and music and various communication devices. Distractions have grown, as have grades. (gasp, could there be social learning tools?!) For many, it is futile to pin them down to their books and expect better rote learning or understanding of a subject. Students now learn on the move too. 
Begs the question.. what is this learning that we seek the ‘how’ of? It is clearly more than rote learning or memorisation. While definitions abound, it is clearly the process of getting to ‘know’ something, and to know it well enough to be able to use it in a new context or situation. The test of the learning is in the use.  
Does that mean that we cannot ever be sure of learning till we have tested for this abillity to use it? Yes. Testing is an integral part of the learning and gap analysis cycle. But testing does not have to be any more than an exercise in gap analysis. Frequent low stakes testing removes the pressure from the learning cycle and is significantly preferable to end of year examinations (or even regular ones) that doom some to ‘failure’. 
Educators keep reminding each other that they do not know what skills and knowledge are going to be required for the future. Much of the knowledge in current books will be redundant soon, so we must show our students how to learn rather than what to learn. The new mantra is ‘Learning how to Learn’.  
Learning how to learn is an interesting concept, as it implies that the content is less important than the techniques. The focus moves to the process, and the flow of knowledge rather than its static retention at the end of the year. There will still be lessons and books and examinations and results. But the emphasis will be on ensuring that various learning techniques and skills have been tried and practiced. 
But why would students do so? If tests are low stakes, and the content is not tested as much as the process is (as with the CCE regime), then what is the incentive for students to participate in the process of learning? Can the process build in a love of learning for its own sake? Can learning become a habit, or even an addiction? So much so that it is not only self sustaining but has learning innovation built into the process. 
As before, what if we remove the fear of failure, then will students seek learning? 

martes, 7 de mayo de 2019

GENDER ISSUES

She ordered an Uber. What she got was a stalker

(PHOTO ILLUSTRATION/RYAN HUDDLE, GLOBE STAFF; ADOBE STOCK IMAGES)
She usually would have walked from her house to the Prudential Center.
But it was raining. So she called an Uber. On the way to the car, she tripped over her feet.
The driver hopped out of the Lexus RX to make sure she was all right. Old enough to be her dad, he seemed nice enough. You know, not like that Uber driver arrested for allegedly raping his passenger on Storrow Drive in March.
What’s going on at the Pru, he asked.
Dinner with a girlfriend, she said.
No boyfriend, he asked.
I’d rather spend time with my dog, she joked.
Advertisement


What’s a beautiful girl like you doing running around single in Boston, he inquired.
On a 16-minute ride on a Sunday afternoon, he asked her a series of rapid-fire questions about where she was from, how long she’d lived in the city, and where she worked.
“My guard was down,” admitted Elle. (The Globe is using only her nickname at her request for safety reasons.) “He’s an old white man in a Lexus. So I think, ‘OK, you’re probably not going to kill me.’ ”
Not like the man suspected of killing a South Carolina woman who mistook his Chevy Impala for her Uber.
Women should be able to safely catch a ride-share, bus, or train without worrying we’ll enter a passenger and exit a victim. Instead, we check license plates. We text a friend when we get in and out of the ride. We look for characteristics that mark a man as “safe.”
Maybe he reminds us of our father. Perhaps he smacks of suburban privilege or he’s too polite and professional to be dangerous. We believe the stereotypes. We forget a predator wears many faces. There is no one kind when it comes to violence against women.
Advertisement


Before the driver unlocked the doors and dropped her off, he handed her his card.
Call me, he said. I’d love to take you out for a cup of coffee or glass of wine.
She wasn’t interested. But she politely said thanks the way women have been told they must in order to keep the male ego intact.
By the time she got home from dinner, she had a stalker. As she walked up the stairs to her building, she saw a piece of paper wedged in the front door.
It was a letter. From the driver. He had returned to her home while she was out.
I hope you had a nice night at the Pru. I have never done anything like this before so I really hope I am not off base. If I am, I am sorry and please disregard this.
And then he went on to talk about her “warming and energetic smile” and again invited her out for a cup of coffee or glass of wine.
The man used information he accessed through Uber and returned to her home, uninvited, and fake apologized before asking her out again.
“I could see the white paper stuffed in the door from the stairs,” she said. “I thought it was a menu so I grabbed it. But it had the name of my job written on the outside of it.”
Luckily, Elle wasn’t alone when she came home to the letter. A friend was with her.
Advertisement


“Dude, that is creepy,” she said to Elle. And it was, but she tried to shrug away the discomfort. And then she couldn’t.
That next day, Monday, she came home from work and took her dog outside for a walk. At the bottom of the stairs, she saw the driver. He was in his car, idling outside of her front door.
He hopped out to join her on the sidewalk.
I was just in the neighborhood, he said. The driver lives on the North Shore. She lives in Back Bay.
I realized that I was off base in asking you out, he said. I realized that today when you didn’t call me and I just wanted to say I’m sorry.
“I wanted to say you have no right to show up here,” she recalled wanting to tell him. “I wanted to say you should not be here. But I did not say any of those things. It’s ingrained in me not to provoke a conflict or say anything that will make someone upset, defensive or angry. I was treading lightly, walking on eggshells to say the right things to keep me safe but get away from him without offense.”
There’s no need for an apology, she said instead. But to be clear, I was not planning on calling you. I don’t want to go on a date. To be honest, we are not necessarily in the same age bracket.
The driver is 62. Elle is 34.
Advertisement


He played with her dog as she spoke. She did her best to drag the pup away and get to walking.
When she returned home, she reported him to Uber. Within an hour, she got a call from customer service. She asked no immediate action be taken to ensure he didn’t trace it back to her. They said they’d be sensitive to her concerns. They said they’d follow up.
On Tuesday, two days after her ride with the driver, two co-workers escorted her home. Elle was too scared to be alone.
But nothing happened. So by Wednesday, she’d returned to her routine.
But so did the driver. When she got home from work that evening, she walked her dog. By the time they made it to the Public Garden, there he was, waiting on the bench closest to the entrance.
She bolted. Underneath the bridge, she dialed 911. Two officers arrived — a man and a woman. She told them everything, including where to find him. The male officer asked her, more than once, if the man was Hispanic.
“I said he is an old white man with salt and pepper hair and red alcohol face,” she recounted.
The police found him on that same bench. He admitted he was waiting for Elle.
He’d been restricted by Uber, meaning he could not access the app to work. When a driver is reported, it’s a company protocol to keep them off the app while investigating to ensure passenger safety. But no one had followed up with Elle to warn her of the swift suspension.
Advertisement


The driver told the officers he was there to apologize. He hadn’t threatened her directly. So they sent him on his way. They told her they made sure he went to his car. It was parked five blocks down the street.
“He was following me,” Elle recalled. “He admitted to the police he was waiting for me. And they couldn’t do a thing, not even issue a citation.”
The female officer advised her to pick up the incident report the next day and file a restraining order. She asked that the police walk her and her dog home. They did.
She contacted Uber through their messaging system when she got home. She told them what happened. She requested a callback. Nobody called that night. No one had talked to her since Sunday.
It wasn’t until Thursday, after she told a male colleague who knew a manager at Uber, that someone from the company called her back. It took a man’s outrage for them to follow up. And all she got was another empty apology.
“What’s been described is troubling and a clear violation of our Community Guidelines,” an Uber spokesperson said in a statement to the Globe on Monday. “The driver’s access to the app was removed.”
Elle didn’t sleep in her own home for three days. After that, friends stayed with her every night for a week.
On Thursday, she filed what is called a Harassment Prevention Order. She had to miss work to do it. The order serves to protect someone from a person who is harassing, stalking, or sexually assaulting them. The order requires three or more occurrences. In cases of assault or sexual violence, it requires just one.
It was a temporary protection. She had to go to court two weeks later to make it permanent.
According to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, one in every six women has been stalked in her life. Yet they have to prove they are afraid in order to be protected. To tell a stalker no is not enough. To reject him nicely doesn’t get the job done. In Massachusetts, he has to violate your space at least three times before a court will take action.
In the days leading up to her court date, Elle’s colleagues and loved ones rallied around her. But some of the input seemed to be more about excusing him. Or questioning her behavior.
Switch up your routine.
Buy pepper spray.
He’s a 60-something from the North Shore. He’s probably harmless and just stupid.
You’re too friendly and need to be standoffish.
He’s probably going through a divorce or something.
On Friday, April 19, 19 days after she first encountered the driver, Elle showed up to court with two girlfriends. And me. The driver came with a lawyer, a woman with the same last name as his carrying a Tory Burch bag filled with the patriarchy.
Elle stood alone, in front of the judge and a courtroom of mostly strangers, and shared her truth. She was terrified of this man who would not quit coming back to her home.
His lawyer spent 20 minutes questioning the validity of her fear.
“She was just uncomfortable,” the lawyer said, drawing a distinction between discomfort and fear.
“He apologized,” the attorney declared, using the fact that Elle was friendly and had a conversation with him rather than running away as proof he wasn’t dangerous.
His lawyer claimed Elle’s need for a Harassment Prevention Order had no merit.
“I was pretty shocked I had to fight for it as hard I did,” Elle said. “I had to really prove the way that I was made to feel, and it was a woman working hard to disprove my fear. I wanted to ask her, ‘What would you do if I was your daughter or your sister or your mother or you? What would you do if you were me in this situation?’ But that wasn’t the context of the hearing.”
His defense rested on the idea that since he didn’t threaten Elle or physically harm her and apologized every time he violated her space, it was all good.
It wasn’t. Uber prohibits sexual conduct between passengers and drivers. As outlined in the company’s community guidelines, there is no flirting, no inquiring about someone’s relationship status, no commenting on physical appearance, no unwanted contact after the ride.
What was your intention, his lawyer asked him. The driver barked the one and only word he said during the entire 37 minutes of the court proceedings: “Friendship.”
The judge said what Elle’s friends were thinking: “From what I heard, the only reason he didn’t come back is because she called the police.”
The Harassment Prevention Order was granted. The driver must not contact her. He must stay away from her home, her work, and 150 yards away from her — for one year. To extend it, she’ll have to go through the process all over again.
This is the best-case scenario.
“It was a lot of hoops I had to jump through,” Elle said. “What if I didn’t have the privilege? I am a woman who sort of knew what steps to take. I am a woman with means. I have a support system. I have a job that offered to relocate me, a job that allowed me to miss days of work to file the paper work and go to court.”
As it stands, women have to work hard to protect themselves from stalking and violence. As women, we are tasked with murder and rape prevention. Men are entitled to our space until we fight for it.
The system, Elle says, should be working harder to protect us.
“I would like for men to drop the act that empowered women disempower men and drop their sense of entitlement to our space and our bodies,” Elle said.
For now, she’s doing what she can to prevent danger.
Elle bought that pepper spray — it’s pink. She keeps her court order close. She texts her friends when she gets home. She shares her location with a few besties at all times.
“I feel comfort knowing they can look at their phones and see where I am at any time.”
We text each other when we get home. We share our locations. We agree to spy on each other and keep tabs on one another in an effort to keep our friends alive. This is our system of safety.
Because womanhood means a man is welcome until proven dangerous.

Jeneé Osterheldt can be reached at jenee.osterheldt@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @sincerelyjenee.